AED Economics 200
Principles of Food and Resource Economics
Winter, 2003


6.  Market Structure:  
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly

Government Intervention:
Antitrust and Regulation


Market Structure

Number of firms/      
            Product type

Activity of Firm
Selling Buying
Many/homogeneous pure or perfect
competition
pure or perfect 
competition
Many/differentiated monopolistic
competition
monopsonistic 
competition
  Few/homogeneous 
               or differentiated
oligopoly oligopsony
One/unique monopoly monopsony

Determinant of Structure - barriers to entry

Strategic -
          Firms' desire to differentiate product 
          (create "market niche")
License
Patent
Natural
          Cost structure of firms
          Control of scarce resource
Network good

Characteristics of most imperfectly competitive markets

Interdependence of firms
Price searchers rather than price takers
Product differentiation
Non-price competition
Advertising
Product design
Research and Development
Price Discrimination
          Firm needs market power
          Separable submarkets
          Arbitrage prevented or minimized

Imperfectly Competitive Markets
- Monopoly
          Model
- Monopolist Competition
          Characteristics
               -many sellers and buyers
               -differentiated product
               -easy entry and exit
           Model
           Excess capacity
- Oligopoly
           Characteristics
                -few sellers and many buyers
                -homogeneous or differentiated product
                -significant barriers to entry
           Several models to explain observed behaviors
Oligopoly Models:
- Kinked Demand Curve
- Price Leadership
- Cartels - firms agree to act like monopoly
              - incentive for cheating
- Game Theory - strategic behavior given interdependence of firms
              - example, Prisoner's Dilemma
- Contestable Markets - concentrated markets may not result in 
                                      high prices and reduced output
              - easy entry
              - new firms have same costs as incumbent firms
              - incumbent firms can exit market and dispose of fixed assets
Industrial Concentration - good or bad?
Case against concentrated industries

Inefficient
Unprogressive
Income inequality
Political dangers

In defense of concentrated industries

Superior products
Underestimating competition
          Potential competition
          Foreign competition
          Substitutes
Economies of scale
Technological progress through R&D

Anti-trust laws - based on U.S. Constitution, Art.I, Sec.8 -
          gives Congress right to regulate commerce
  1. Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)
         Section 1 - makes restraint of trade illegal
         Section 2 - illegal to conspire with others
  2. Clayton Act (1914) - specifies illegal actions when they lessen competition or create a monopoly
         price discrimination between purchasers
         exclusive dealings - prohibiting retailer from selling product of a rival
         tie-in sales
         interlocking directorates
         some mergers
  3. Federal Trade Commission (1914) - 
         empowered to combat unfair methods of competition
  4. Robinson-Patman Act (1936) - amended Clayton Act; designed to limit price discrimination
  5. Wheeler-Lea Act (1938) - empowered FTC to deal with false and deceptive trade practices (e.g., advertising)
  6. Celler-Kefauver Antimerger Act (1950) - amended Clayton Act limits mergers by buying assets prohibited mergers where there was concentration
  7. Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (1976) - amended Clayton Act requires premerger notification by firms
Exemptions from Anti-trust Laws
  1. Agricultural cooperatives - Clayton Act
  2. Labor unions - Clayton Act
  3. Sports organizations
  4. Export industries - Webb-Pomerene Act
  5. Regulated industries and insurance
Govt. intervention to affect market structure, conduct, performance
Prosecute anti-competitive practices

Price fixing
Market segmentation and agreements not to compete
False and deceptive advertising
tie-in sales

Affect structure of industry

Break up monopoly
Prevent mergers and acquisitions

Regulation of industries
Government Ownership


Top of Page

[Home] [Syllabus] [Class Notes]